Tag: Decision rights
-
Again the Same Decision – The Elevator Button Problem
Someone presses the elevator button even though it is already lit. Then someone else does the same. Transformation teams do this too. They reopen decisions because the system never made the decision feel final. The problem is not impatience. It is missing closure. Read More
Written by
-
Fear Disguised as Prudence
A driver hesitates too long merging into traffic and suddenly creates more friction, not less. Organizations do the same thing in transformation. What sounds like prudence is often fear, weak decision rights, and an invisible cost of delay wearing a respectable suit. Read More
Written by
-
Why Transformation Teams Need a Different Clock
In my kitchen, two clocks never agree. And that is exactly why they work. Companies try to run transformation on the same clock as operations. That is why decisions stall. Transformation needs a different clock. Not to move faster, but to stop reopening the same decision again and again. Read More
Written by
-
Emotions as Signal, Not Noise
Leaders often treat frustration, defensiveness, and avoidance as noise to calm down or coach away. That is a mistake. In transformation work, repeated emotional patterns are often operational signals. Frustration usually points to blocked flow, rework, or impossible trade-offs. Defensiveness often reveals exposed accountability, hidden vetoes, or unsafe truth-telling. Avoidance usually shows up where ownership… Read More
Written by
-
“We Should Have Known Before”: The Fear Behind Late Decision Escalations
Late escalations rarely happen because people didn’t know earlier. More often, teams hesitate to escalate because escalation feels risky: it can signal failure, loss of control, or political exposure. So issues stay too low in the organization longer than they should. By the time they reach leadership, someone inevitably says, “We should have known before.”… Read More
Written by
-
Veto power without criteria is how slippage is born
The work didn’t slip because the program was complex. It slipped because someone could say “no” without saying why. That’s the silent veto: informal influence overriding formal governance, off-line, without criteria, without accountability, and without a path to resolution. It feels safer than disagreeing in the room. It also manufactures rework. Teams build, then hit… Read More
Written by
