Tag: governance design
-
Fear Disguised as Prudence
A driver hesitates too long merging into traffic and suddenly creates more friction, not less. Organizations do the same thing in transformation. What sounds like prudence is often fear, weak decision rights, and an invisible cost of delay wearing a respectable suit. Read More
Written by
-
The Ocean Liner Problem in Transformation Governance
Regular business governance protects the company for good reasons. It reduces risk, protects margin, and keeps operations stable. But transformation decisions do not behave like normal operational decisions. They are more cross-functional, more time-sensitive, and more likely to create rework when delayed. This is the ocean liner problem: the governance model that is right for… Read More
Written by
-
Veto power without criteria is how slippage is born
The work didn’t slip because the program was complex. It slipped because someone could say “no” without saying why. That’s the silent veto: informal influence overriding formal governance, off-line, without criteria, without accountability, and without a path to resolution. It feels safer than disagreeing in the room. It also manufactures rework. Teams build, then hit… Read More
Written by
-
Fear vs Power vs Ambiguity: how to diagnose what’s really happening in your steering committee
When decisions stall, the root cause is usually one of three forces: fear of risk, power over control, or pure ambiguity about what is being approved. Fear shows up as endless diligence. Power shows up as quiet vetoes and re-opened decisions. Ambiguity shows up as debates about definitions instead of tradeoffs. If you misdiagnose the… Read More
Written by
